Item Set Skill Revamp and Balancing

First of all, I would like to thank you for this great opportunity to work together with the community on balancing!
I think it's good that you are aware of the topic and want to treat it as well.

Although I find the potential change in set skills good, I wonder if changing or replacing some set-skills will adequately capture the complex topic of balancing.
Fundamental class differences can certainly be remedied well, but I wonder to what extent such class differences prevail at all seriously.

Classes which are actually balanced in my opinion are: druid, scout, priest, champ, knight, warlock, warden and rogue. In my opinion, global class inequalities are reduced to the magician, who cannot keep up with other classes in damage. Surely you can argue with the other classes, whether one or the other is stronger or worse, and possibly there may have a small adjustment also have positive effects.
I think much more decisive is currently not the damage done to the different classes, but the disadvantage that close combatants die much faster because of damage to the surface than as far-fliers. Perhaps this could be counteracted by adding a set-skill similar to the weapon master of the warrior for these classes, which would reduce the area damage suffered.

However, most of the necessary balancing is in the different secondary classes of the different classes. Because while now you can actually play any class with one or more secondary classes meaningful, there are some class combinations that are not useful because their skills are not adapted or too weak.

Therefore, I would be very happy if this problem is also treated. Maybe only after the set skills, if that would be too much at the same time. Nevertheless, this aspect should also be considered during the set-skills balancing so that no aggravations occur, also with regard to the different class combinations.

Quote from Dendrobatus

Classes which are actually balanced in my opinion are: druid, scout, priest, champ, knight, warlock, warden and rogue. In my opinion, global class inequalities are reduced to the magician,

How do you think about the warrior as pDD?

Quote from Dendrobatus

However, most of the necessary balancing is in the different secondary classes of the different classes. Because while now you can actually play any class with one or more secondary classes meaningful, there are some class combinations that are not useful because their skills are not adapted or too weak.

I think, it is alomst impossible to equal all classes in their use. Except some special ones, as u said before, the balancing is already quite well, with some special items like magic 2H-sword its even better than on other servers.

Quote from Dendrobatus

Therefore, I would be very happy if this problem is also treated. Maybe only after the set skills, if that would be too much at the same time. Nevertheless, this aspect should also be considered during the set-skills balancing so that no aggravations occur, also with regard to the different class combinations.

I would always vote for diversity, but to be honest: if you need to decide where to set focus on, i would prefer new challenges like bosses, instances etc.

Re-balancing - most often reason for Rage Quit on any MMO.

Sometimes even little fixes create huge problems.

but support have 100% helpnes form Player's
Thor ->> this is great subject
Players can say what is bad what is good
Huge problem? can be fixed like Aldo
easy